How She Tweets. How He Tweets?

My Life on Twitter

Over the course of my life on Twitter I’ve collaborated with a number of people. They include:

@thehrgoddess – Jane Perdue, research on how professional women perceive and use power

@SusanMazza – workshop proposal

@MarionChapsal – top secret project

@CherryWoodburn – @Chrysula @JenniferVMiller – contributors to the top secret project

@DorothyDalton – small group testing the viability of a business

@MarciaReynolds – guest blogger on her Hufffington Post column

@LauraGoodrich – guest on her radio show

@ElisCoit – guest on her radio show

@MikeHenrySR & @KellyKettleboeter – led a webinar for Lead Change and recipient of many generosities from both

@eschreyer – exploring possibilities

@davecarpenter @KatTansey – contributed to their e-book

@AndresTTapia – conversations in diversity. Generously sent me his book The Inclusion Paradox

@TMODOM – Tanya Odom is presenting to a professional organization where I serve as VP of Programs. Tanya is also the inspiration behind #lifewithmyboys

In addition to collaborations there are friendships and helping hands.

@minutrition – personal librarian who sends articles of interest that expand my world

@royatkinson – provided Mac tutorials and we occasionally laugh together on Friday afternoon phone calls

@Dr.DavidBallard & @SCJoson – Advisors to me in my role as Chief Cultural Idiot Officer, providing instant answers to questions such as What is <3? Remington Steele? etc.  David introduced me to the HR leader of a company that won the Psychologically Healthy Work Place Award and I interviewed her for an article on Work-Life Flow – creating a culture of engagement.

@KevinWGrossman – initiated a pick your brain call as he’s launching a new career direction

@timhurson – responded to @marionchapsal invitation and is contributing to our top secret project.

@emoticomma – wonderful laughs as well as deeply touching conversations about life unforeseen

@GwynT – a role model of grace and good humor who has generously shared her story with me

How She Tweets

Here’s how it typically goes between women. A direct exchange follows common interest in a topic.  We sniff and dance around each other with a few DMs or Replies. Follow Fridays come next. The courtship continues with a supportive comment on each others’ posts. Eventually there may be an email exchange or skype call. And if the dating goes well an invitation to engage professionally may result. Some of us have even met in person or had group skype calls. It is typically a mix of play and work, although sometimes just pure fun – Patti Dragand who is @strategicsense @JudiCogen and I shared Friday night wine when one of us put out a call for some cheering up. There may also be a request for permission to quote @phyllismufston or generous feedback on a new website. The major step in these various moves centers around positive feedback and connection. Difference and differentiation come later.

How He Tweets?

The other day I had a different experience with a @drbret. He and and I have occasionally retweeted each other, and I think there may have been one or two replies or DMs.  Recently, Bret referenced my post What’s Missing from the Halls of Power in his post Discover Your Own Wisdom. I was highly flattered when I received the automated notice and immediately hit “approve.”  After stroking my own ego I went to Bret’s site and to my further delight discovered he had quoted me at the very top of his post. WOW. I hoped that my head would still fit through the doorway. It got even better. Bret referred to me as an accomplished professional. Surely the doorways would need to be widened.

BUT WAIT. What was this? Bret was criticizing what I said. How could he do this? He didn’t even reach out to me before posting. I felt insulted, used and a bit of the fool. He was using my quote to make a point about what people shouldn’t do. Ouch. Deflation. Downsize the doorways.

Atop My High Horse and Back Down Again

Within minutes I was riding my high Feminine horse. “A woman would not treat a twitter friend this way. She would find common ground, connect, and co-labor-ate. This is the way it should be done if we are to learn and grow together.”

Enter C.E.O. of my E.G.O. She observed my petty reactions and had a few words with me after which Little Ms. Defensive got off her high horse. Her emotional response dissipated and her old friend Thinking returned. New thoughts began to flow.

Could it be that a challenge is another way to engage and create a shift in thinking? Could it be that Bret was engaging as a colleague but in a different way? Suddenly I was energized. The CEO left me the following note:

“Dear Missy Biz Shrink. You grew. Bret’s actions caused you to react. That reaction led to a sense of outrage.  That outrage made your adrenaline flow. That adrenaline flow made your brain pop. That brain pop opened up a new perspective.  That perspective expanded your thinking. So what, Missy Biz Shrink, is your problem? You believe in growth and expanded thinking. Get over yourself and your need to have people do it your way.”

There you have it. Men and women – sometimes we do things differently. Both approaches have value but only if we value them.  So did I

1. Invite Bret into a conversation?

2. Write this blog without doing so?

3. Discover a 3rd both/and option?

Visit Bret’s blog to find out.

This exchange with Bret has been more like a ping pong volley (challenge) than a cheer leading squad (support), which is what I’ve experienced with women on social media. Each works. Imagine the value added when they work together.

17 Responses to “How She Tweets. How He Tweets?”

[...] One of my recent posts entitled “Discover Your Own Wisdom,” was inspired by something I read on Dr. Anne Perchel’s website, Germane Consulting.  Anne has written what I think is a fascinating and insightful account of how she reacted when she read my post, which I would strongly encourage you to read right now by clicking this link. [...]

Tanya M. Odom says:

Anne,
GREAT list… THANK YOU for including me on it.

AND… thank you for your creativity and spirit of collaboration.

Anne says:

Tanya – You are the spirit of support. Thank you.

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bret L Simmons, Anne Perschel. Anne Perschel said: RT @drbret and @bizshrink she tweets, he tweets – our cross blog conversation http://ht.ly/2pm5x #diversity pls share ur views [...]

Gwyn Teatro says:

Hi Anne,

Two things:

1. Thank you including me in your “Twitter List”. I am always learning from you and from so many others who are part of your “Twitter collaborators”

2. At my peril, I have left a comment on Bret’s post. It may not be terribly enlightening but I thought I’d have a go :)
Gwyn Teatro´s last post ..My Next Beginning…A Reflection on ChangeMy Profile

Anne says:

Gwyn – You are, as I stated in the post, a role model of grace and humor for the unexpected “guests” that knock at life’s doors. Please consider following @emoticomma if you aren’t already doing so. She is like-hearted.
Regarding your comment on Bret’s post that he and I are in agreement. Yes, you are right. We agree on the content while our approaches to the relational aspects are different. It’s all so enlightening and expanding to explore. Who would have thunk that social media would lead to this?

Bret Simmons says:

Thanks for reaching out and engaging me in conversation, Anne. I was very interested to lean your perspective. If you had not taken the initiative this exchange would not have taken place. Thanks! Bret

Anne says:

Bret – I’m enjoying the engagement and the learning. You’ve stretched my thinking such that I now see the frame for the way we differently approach relationship is not limited to gender. It is also determined by MBTI type and professional orientation. Thank you. The icing on the cake is your openness to seeing that you sometimes don’t see the privilege and cultural blindness that come being a white male. Hope this makes sense and that you receive it as a high compliment – as intended. In my view, the best any of us can hope for is to sing with meaning, “I once was blind but now I see.”

I think this post illustrates the spirit of Twitter and it’s wonderful potential for connection. It’s so hard to describe Twitter to people who don’t participate, but I think you’ve got the flavor.

Thanks for including me Anne.

Anne says:

Much gratitude Phyllis. You are always welcome here.

SCJoson says:

Anne, loved this post. You captured essence of the Twitter dance so well. From the rule of 3 to bird watching, it’s always a great conversation. <3

Anne says:

Shayna – I’m honored by your comment and am continuously delighted by the opportunities to learn from you and others in the connected universe.

Anne – I have shared many of your experiences on Twitter. They have been both supportive and challenging but truthfully from both men and women in equal measure. I have not experienced a gender split in perhaps the way you have, where it’s mainly the women who are connecting with positive feedback.

In fact, some of the most strident engagement in a few of the discussions I’ve initiated has been from the ladies, along the lines of ” Dorothy, what on earth are you thinking?”. Or stronger!

But for me this is the beauty of the blogsphere – the exchange of ideas and great discussions. I’ve learned to be more precise with my vocabulary choice and to understand that anyone who challenges what I’ve written is simply opening another door. But most of all they are stimulated enough to respond! I love it!

It’s wonderful that a short phrase from your posts initiated such a great debate!
Dorothy Dalton´s last post ..Should mentoring by executives be mandatoryMy Profile

Anne says:

Dorothy – As i was writing this post, I was aware of naming numerous men who have also engaged through connection. And you are a perfect example of a woman who speaks differences of opinion and/or frame, as exemplified by your comment.

What seemed different about Bret’s process was reference and disagreement in a public forum without connecting first. In his later post, responding to this one, Bret references 3 areas of diversity between us. One includes his academic affiliation, where ideas are primary and open for discussion as well as challenge in public forums. I may have landed too quickly on the identification of a male/female difference as the only and primary diversity between Bret and me.

At the same time, there is support for the idea that women connect first and demarcate later. Whereas men tend to begin with marking their territory – be it academic, business or otherwise. Bret marked the differences between his ideas and mine. Often times in business (a domain designed by men) people introduce themselves by marking their position and their the extent of their fiefdoms. Not a bad thing, just different from women designed cultures that tend to focus on connection first – exploring how we are alike.

I am reminded of a chance meeting after riding the down escalator at a national women’s leadership conference. As I was stepping off a woman came rushing over to admire and touch the colorful draping at the bottom of my sweater as she said, “What beautiful colors, I just love it.” It turns out she is the head of the women’s leadership program of a prestigious college known for innovation. Later, she became my mentor and we talked about this first encounter. She was the one who shared with me the research on women’t tendency to connect first and mark/differentiate later. Each style has it’s plusses and minuses. Women sometimes over-connect and relationships can become fraught with boundary violations.

I love that we can engage in what are for me meaningful discussions that expand my awareness and my thinking as Bret and you have done.

In Sincere Virtual Connection and Exchange –
Anne

Laura Daley says:

I love your analytical self. And I love hearing examples of logic and emotion in your response–both are possible, and part of who we are. As my father always says to me, without emotion, we are boring. So there you go-if the emotion comes out as outrage, or fight, or competition, or passion, or empathy, it’s all interesting and it’s what makes us unique. Logic has no personality–we add that with our emotion.—And, to be consistent with your stereotypical analysis, whatever help you need in beating up Bret, let me know. :) :) Laura

Anne says:

Laura – Thank you (and your Dad) from all the places in my heart and brain. I will quote both of you often – with reference of course. “Without emotion we are boring,” and “Logic has no personality.” Sent a warning tweet to Dr. Bret that you and your Dad are on your way, armed with Words of Wisdom. Have a wonderful day Lady Laura, and I wish I could attend 85 Broads tomorrow.

Laura Daley says:

We will. We have about 160 people in each workshop, so lots of energy and fun! It’s not 85 Broads though–this is Hilary and my stuff. Questioning, listening and presentation skills. 85 Broad event-our biggie is October 27th. Stuff coming out on that soon!

Leave a New Comment

CommentLuv badge